About Cricketin: Who We Are and What We Do

Cricketin is an information site for readers in India. We explain cricket, online-gaming law, money risks, privacy, and safer choices in plain English. We do not tell people where to place a bet.

This page sets out our scope, our limits. the checks behind our work. It also says what the site owner must verify before launch.

Our purpose is to explain, not to push

We publish clear guides about cricket and the risks around online money games. Our readers may want help with odds, match terms, app safety, tax, privacy, and the law. We aim to explain those subjects without hype.

The site is for people in India. We use simple words where we can. We show a formula when a number matters. We link to the source next to a legal claim. If a fact is not confirmed, we say so.

Our legal hub, Online Gaming Law in India, brings together the rules that shape this topic. Our guide hub, Cricket and Betting Guides, explains the words and maths people may see online.

What readers can expect to find here

We publish explainers, checklists, and worked examples. A cricket guide may explain a match format or a score rule. A safety guide may show why an unknown app file can put data at risk. A legal guide may separate a law from a claim made in an ad.

We also explain simple maths. For example, our guides show how decimal odds turn into implied chance, and how an odds margin works. Read How Cricket Odds Work and our guide to overround for that method.

Some topics can cause harm. On those pages we put safety before detail. Our responsible gaming guidance and our page on help for gambling harm point readers toward practical support.

What we do not publish

We do not publish operator rankings, brand reviews, bonus offers, promo codes, download links, APK files, or payment steps. We do not use calls that ask a reader to join, deposit, or play. We do not present money games as a way to earn.

This is not a missing feature. It is a choice about safety and law. Section 6 of the PROG Act says that a person must not make or help make an ad that directly or indirectly promotes an online money game. Read the wording in the official Act text on India Code.

That rule is why a reader will not find a list of named operators here. It is also why we do not turn a legal explainer into a path to an operator. For a fuller explanation, see PROG Act 2025 Explained.

Our rule on operators is clear

We do not compare, score, recommend, or link to online money-game operators. We do not make mini-reviews. We do not list welcome amounts. We do not publish referral codes. These choices apply to text, tables, buttons, and images.

We also do not accept a request from an operator to be placed on the site. A request to change a factual error is different. It will be handled through our Fix Rule and Log. A request to publish a paid placement will not be considered.

Section 6 covers direct and indirect promotion in electronic media. The law also sets a penalty for an ad made in breach of that section. The official Act places that penalty in section 9(2). Read sections 6 and 9 in the Act text.

How we decide what to publish

Each page starts with a reader question. We then ask whether the answer can be supported by a primary source, a clear calculation. a clearly named limit. If it cannot, we remove it or label the gap.

Legal claims need a law, court record, or official notice. Tax claims need an official tax source. A calculation needs inputs, a formula, a result, and its limits. Our testing and check method explains the last part in detail.

A page is not finished just because it sounds confident. We check whether its links work, whether its dates are clear, and whether a short sentence could mislead. Our Content Rule sets the rules for sources, updates, AI tools, and fix.

How we make money

There are no affiliate links to operators on this site. We do not earn a fee when a reader goes to an operator, opens an account, deposits money, or takes an offer. That is why our pages do not have operator buttons or tracking links.

The funding model is not published yet. What an audit of the live code does show is the absence of the usual money routes: no operator link, no affiliate redirect, no advertising script. The owner must also state whether any sponsor can affect editorial content. Do not publish a vague statement in place of this note.

Our separate Affiliate Disclosure records the no-operator-link rule and tells readers how we would announce a major change.

Every page names its writer and its reviewer

Every page here carries two names at the top: the person who wrote it and the person who read it back. Writer and reviewer are never the same person: the editor reads back most of the site, and the pages the editor writes about the site itself are checked by the data editor.

Each name links to a profile page: what that person covers, where the role stops, and every page on this site they wrote or checked. If a byline looks wrong, that page is the place to start, and the fix route is below.

Our authors and editors page lists the seven people, what each one covers, and who reviews whom.

The seven profiles are one page each: editor-in-chief, cricket analyst, betting analyst, legal writer, payments expert and responsible gaming officer. Each page describes what the role signs off, not who currently holds it.

Reader privacy and reader control

We aim to collect as little data as the site needs. The privacy page names the data categories, their purpose. the planned keep time rule. The cookie page explains how browser storage may work.

The DPDP Act says that consent, when it is the basis for use, must be free, specific, informed, unconditional, and unambiguous. It also requires clear notice. Read sections 4 to 6 in the MeitY Act text.

See our Privacy Rule and Cookie Rule. Those pages contain implementation items that the owner must verify before launch.

How to challenge our work

Readers can flag an error, a missing source. a privacy concern. We want the page URL, the words at issue. a link or write down that supports the fix. We will not hide a material fix by changing a page without a note.

A monitored content route and a separate legal or privacy route are not published yet. The route may be an email address or a form. But it must be monitored and it must identify who handles the request.

Read our Contact Cricketin page for the planned request types and our Terms of Use for rules that apply to the site.

We use facts. We show the source. We say when we do not know. We do not hide a gap. We make the next step clear. We keep the words short.